Difference between revisions of "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince"
m (6 revision(s)) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{bookheader | author=J. K. Rowling | pubdate=2005 | pages=652 | read=2005.12.25 | rate=8 | expect=10|ISBN=0-439-78454-9}} | + | {{bookheader | author=J. K. Rowling | pubdate=2005 | pages=652 | read=2005.12.25 | rate=8 | expect=10|ISBN=0-439-78454-9|title=Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince}} |
I'm surprised I didn't hear anything in the press about someone dying in this one. They made a big deal about it in the last book, but I didn't hear anyone mention it in this one. | I'm surprised I didn't hear anything in the press about someone dying in this one. They made a big deal about it in the last book, but I didn't hear anyone mention it in this one. | ||
Revision as of 23:11, 16 December 2006
| Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I'm surprised I didn't hear anything in the press about someone dying in this one. They made a big deal about it in the last book, but I didn't hear anyone mention it in this one.
That said, I have a feeling he's going to pull a Gandalf in the last book. (After all, he's been associated with the pheonix ever since the beginning.)
I was caught unexpectedly by the identity of the Half-Blood Prince, although in retrospect it was fairly obvious. I think Rowling did a good job with the misdirection, constantly reminding us that Voldemort was half-blood.
So... is Snape a death-eater or isn't he? I think that's the one resolution I'm most interested in in the final book.
Overall, I enjoyed the read, but I think some of the others in the series have been better. The misdirection was good, but the pensive scenes felt a little artificial. (There should have been a better way to have the Exposition without breaking the main story flow.)
--Tometheus 5 January 2006
