Difference between revisions of "Talk:RanTom Thoughts/20070411 Global Warming"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by 193.201.81.3 (Talk); changed back to last version by WikiSysop) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:1 vote for image #2 (stream in spring/winter) | :1 vote for image #2 (stream in spring/winter) | ||
− | + | Short, sweet, to the point, FREEexactly as infrmoation should be! | |
− | |||
− | |||
==Misc. Links of Interest== | ==Misc. Links of Interest== |
Revision as of 11:21, 10 July 2011
20070411 Global Warming
Tell me which image should go into my permanent Gallery, if any. I like the last two bud + snow pictures, but I can't decide which I like better. Help me out here! (OK, you can give me your thoughts on GW too and tell me how wrong I am, etc, etc, but please be polite :D) -- Tometheus (talk) 10:27, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
Gallery selection
I personally am leaning towards the last image when it's at full scale -- Tometheus (talk) 11:47, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
- 1 vote for image #2 (stream in spring/winter)
Short, sweet, to the point, FREEexactly as infrmoation should be!
Misc. Links of Interest
- 35 Inconvenient Truths
- NOTE, this is disputing Al Gore's version of Global Warming itself, which is interesting, but again, not my point in the Rant. My point was that while the climate may be warming, it doesn't mean the destruction of life itself as the fearmongers would have us believe. (Life got it's great diversity during previous warm cycles on the planet.) Pollution itself is what we need to focus on, not just CO2 emissions. Also, the source of this article (SPPI) is clearly biased, but they still have some good points. (To average out with Gore's arguments and cancel each other out :) .)